Evolution of Humanitarian Connectivity

Few areas have made as significant an impact on humanitarian response as the evolution of connectivity. As connectivity technology evolved, humanitarian organizations have been at the forefront of leveraging those innovations to transform how aid is delivered and improve coordination in times of crisis (Ramalingam et al., 2009). This evolution reflects a journey from reliance on traditional communication systems to leveraging digital technologies, a journey that has fundamentally altered the dynamics of humanitarian operations. A pivotal aspect of this journey is the history and role of satellite connectivity, which has been instrumental in overcoming logistical challenges and enhancing the efficiency of humanitarian efforts (Olafsson, 2011; Palen & Liu, 2007).

Historically, humanitarian responses were hampered by the need for reliable communication infrastructures, particularly in remote or conflict-affected areas. The reliance on analog communication methods, such as landline telephones and fax machines, often led to delays in information sharing and complicated the coordination among different actors involved in the response efforts (Bloom & Faulkner, 2015; Crowley & Chan, 2011).

The early 20th century saw the advent of radio communication, providing a wireless means of exchanging critical information in disaster-stricken areas (Dutton, 2011). These initial communication technologies, particularly long-range high-frequency (HF) radios, laid the groundwork for improved communication capabilities in the humanitarian sector. The 1960s witnessed a significant leap forward with the launch of communication satellites. These satellites enabled global connectivity, allowing humanitarian organizations to establish communication links in remote and disaster-affected regions (Goggin, 2011). Organizations like MSF utilized satellite communication for telemedicine projects, enhancing their ability to provide medical assistance in areas with limited infrastructure (Ling, 1994). The integration of satellite technology into humanitarian response marked a crucial turning point in overcoming geographical barriers and expanding the reach of humanitarian communication. Satellites also provided a novel means of communication that was not dependent on terrestrial infrastructure, which could be easily damaged or even be non-existent in some disaster zones (Chan et al., 2012; Meier, 2015).

The availability and capabilities of connectivity solutions available to humanitarian responders have significantly evolved over the past two decades. At the start of this century, only large organizations such as the United Nations had the funds to leverage the available satellite-based connectivity. Many areas they operated in had no communication infrastructure, making the few and expensive satellite options available their only ability to connect to the rest of the world (Olafsson, 2011; Steckler, 2013; Summer, 2010).

Using satellite phones and data transmission devices enabled real-time communication and information exchange between field responders and coordination hubs, vastly improving the decision-making processes and overall effectiveness of humanitarian response missions (Betts et al., 2012). During the Kosovo refugee crisis in 1999, for example, satellite technology was critical in facilitating the coordination of aid delivery and establishing refugee camps, genuinely showcasing the crucial potential of satellite connectivity to enhance operational outcomes (Avvenuti et al., 2016).

The evolution of satellite connectivity in humanitarian response also involves the development and availability of satellite-based internet services. This innovation allowed for the deployment of portable internet solutions in emergency settings, ensuring that responders could access online resources, communicate via email, and participate in virtual coordination meetings, irrespective of the conditions of the local communication infrastructure. The use of satellite-based internet was essential during the Haiti earthquake response in 2010, which enabled a coordinated effort among international responders, local authorities, and NGOs (Meier, 2015; Morrow et al., 2016).

Despite the significant advantages of satellite connectivity, challenges such as high costs, technical complexities, and the need for specialized skills for operation and maintenance limited its widespread adoption in the humanitarian sector. Efforts to overcome these challenges in recent years have included the development of more cost-effective satellite communication solutions and training humanitarian personnel in setting up and operating satellite technologies (Palen & Liu, 2007; Whipkey & Verity, 2015).

The rapid spread of Internet and mobile connectivity over the past decade marked another pivotal shift in humanitarian communication, enabling greater coordination capabilities and improved information sharing among humanitarian organizations (Avvenuti et al., 2016; Chan et al., 2012). However, the real transformative change in communication capabilities came with the proliferation of mobile devices and social media, which led to the democratization of information generation and sharing (Crowley & Chan, 2011). The 2010 Haiti earthquake response showcased the potential of digital connectivity, as volunteers worldwide used open-source mapping tools and social media to gather and disseminate crisis information, fundamentally changing the landscape of humanitarian response (Meier, 2012; Morrow et al., 2016).

The evolution of connectivity solutions within the humanitarian sector is directly linked to the availability of connectivity solutions in the broader society. The explosive growth in mobile phone ownership, especially in Africa, has been one of the critical drivers for this change, and the humanitarian sector has greatly benefitted from the mobile phone revolution (Lundqvist & Erlandsson, 2014).

Digital connectivity also enabled the development of crowdsourced platforms, such as Ushahidi, which allowed people in crisis zones to directly report their needs and observations via SMS or web entries. These platforms improved situational awareness for responders and empowered affected communities, making them active participants rather than passive recipients of aid (Meier, 2015; Zook et al., 2010). Mobile money and blockchain technology further exemplify this evolution, enabling direct, transparent, and efficient financial transactions to support aid delivery in remote or insecure environments (Madianou, 2019; Zwitter & Boisse-Despiaux, 2018).

Despite these advancements, the digital divide remains a significant challenge. The benefits of digital connectivity in humanitarian response are not universally accessible, with disparities in technology access, language skills, and literacy affecting both the effectiveness of digital humanitarian tools and the equity of aid distribution (Palen & Liu, 2007; Whipkey & Verity, 2015). Efforts to bridge this divide are crucial to ensure that the evolution of connectivity continues to enhance humanitarian response inclusively.

The continued evolution of connectivity in humanitarian response will likely see further innovations in satellite technology, including deploying low-earth orbit (LEO) satellites, which promise to provide even faster internet speeds and more reliable communication capabilities. These advancements can further revolutionize humanitarian operations, making connectivity more accessible and effective in supporting the needs of affected populations (Sandvik, 2016; Scott-Smith, 2016).

Bibliography

Avvenuti, M., Cimino, M. G., Cresci, S., Marchetti, A., & Tesconi, M. (2016). A framework for detecting unfolding emergencies using humans as sensors. Springerplus, 5(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1674-y

Betts, A., Bloom, L., & Omata, N. (2012). Humanitarian innovation and refugee protection. RSC Working Paper Series, 85.

Bloom, L., & Faulkner, R. (2015). Innovation Spaces: Transforming humanitarian practice in the United Nations (Working Paper, Issue. O. University. https://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/publications/innovation-spaces-transforming-humanitarian-practice-in-the-united-nations

Chan, J. L., Colombo, R., & Musani, A. (2012, 22/04/2012). Mapping libyan health facilities-A collaboration between crisis mappers and the world health organization. ISCRAM 2012 - 9th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Vancouver, Canada.

Crowley, J., & Chan, J. L. (2011). Disaster Relief 2.0: the Future of Information Sharing in Humanitarian Emergencies. OCHA. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/disaster-relief-20-future-information-sharing-humanitarian-emergencies

Dutton, W. H. (2011). Freedom of Connection, Freedom of Expression: The Changing Legal and Regulatory Ecology Shaping the Internet. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000191594

Goggin, G. (2011). Global mobile media. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Global-Mobile-Media/Goggin/p/book/9780415469180

Ling, R. (1994). Telemedicine—treating the patient by remote control. Journal of Wilderness Medicine, 5(4), 455-457. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1580/0953-9859-5.4.455

Lundqvist, M., & Erlandsson, F. (2014). The diffusion of mobile phones and its impact on financial inclusion and economic growth in Africa [Master, Lund University]. Lund, Sweden. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=4647621&fileOId=4647622

Madianou, M. (2019). Technocolonialism: Digital Innovation and Data Practices in the Humanitarian Response to Refugee Crises. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 2056305119863146. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2056305119863146

Meier, P. (2012). Crisis mapping in action: How open source software and global volunteer networks are changing the world, one map at a time. Journal of map & geography libraries, 8(2), 89-100. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15420353.2012.663739

Meier, P. (2015). Digital humanitarians: how big data is changing the face of humanitarian response. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Digital-Humanitarians-How-Big-Data-Is-Changing-the-Face-of-Humanitarian-Response/Meier/p/book/9781482248395

Morrow, N., Mock, N., Bauer, J.-M., & Browning, J. (2016). Knowing Just in Time: Use Cases for Mobile Surveys in the Humanitarian World. Procedia Engineering, 159, 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.163

Olafsson, G. (2011). Information and Communication Technology Usage in the 2010 Pakistan Floods. NetHope. https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/information-and-communication-technology-usage-2010-pakistan-floods

Palen, L., & Liu, S. B. (2007). Citizen communications in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems,

Ramalingam, B., Scriven, K., & Foley, C. (2009). Innovations in International Humanitarian Action. Overseas Development Institute. https://www.calpnetwork.org/publication/innovations-in-international-humanitarian-action/

Sandvik, K. B. (2016). Stronger, faster, better: Three logics of humanitarian futureproofing. In Humanitarianism and Challenges of Cooperation (pp. 97-112). Routledge. https://www.prio.org/publications/8753

Scott-Smith, T. (2016). Humanitarian neophilia: the “innovation turn’ and its implications. Third World Quarterly, 37(12), 2229-2251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1176856

Steckler, B. (2013). Hastily Formed Networks. Retrieved 29/05/2014 from https://calhoun.nps.edu/entities/publication/9050ae55-4d7f-4728-aed6-3cb3bbfc5618

Summer, M. (2010). The value of information and communication technologies in humanitarian relief efforts. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 5(4), 55-68. https://direct.mit.edu/itgg/article/5/4/55/9631/The-Value-of-Information-and-Communication

Whipkey, K., & Verity, A. (2015). Guidance for incorporating big data into humanitarian operations (Digital Humanitarian Network, Issue. DHNetwork. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/guidance-incorporating-big-data-humanitarian-operations

Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2(2), 7-33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2202/1948-4682.1069

Zwitter, A., & Boisse-Despiaux, M. (2018). Blockchain for humanitarian action and development aid. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-018-0044-5